LINK to what it can mean to say the "CORRECT".
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7180960209475969028/Actual launch of Apollo 13, 1970. Hear "lift-off at 2:13. "
See LINK to the three astronauts of Apollo 13 talk in a press conference of some sort about their space flight in 1970.( link)

 

songfilepage.html

NEW notes on Apollo 13 (MORE NEW on Apollo 13, 1996/Apollo 13, 1970, when its the recount movie. Its JUNE 28, 2024. The scene where Swigert hits his head and the two argue. To HEAR- RITARD. To hear INVALIDITY. Was it not so?, watch the scene. To conclude "Sir Isaac Newton". But what was to the driver's seat in the ship, why?, because that would be correct. Listen to the scene. That there was connected people, connected in an understanding. That there was the electricity, was the computer, were then the parachutes. )COMPUTER DIFFICULTIES 321. So to recall "Sir Isaac Newton", we thank, for that success. And the military GOAL, to consider waging of wars, that goes back in time. War a sin but a necessary sin. But is it not to stay correct? So to CROWN, Jack Swigert, was he not representative of the other side?, as there's COLD WAR. To point out the important rights of the other side would mean to stay correct. That famous smile on the face of Gene Kranz, success, that there were the parachutes. (was whatever, that he knew the computer..) Say known, understood. Future $ goal in mind.

To comments on the 1939 Hollywood film Gone With The Wind

To NEW NOTES on GONE WITH THE WIND, May 20, 2024

See what it can mean CLOCK and COMPUTER when things are CORRECT ($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noting, "yes, they'll get you on that", filing late. But Jack Swigert came in at the last minute and President Nixon himself granted an extension to file.
Recall goldfish when there were three. One, two, fish behind. See behind.
On that it was his fault? As they're trying to figure how then they will be turning around and making it back to Earth. dvl invalid? To say RESPONSIBLE
The left weakness, where a wedding band might go of gold or diamonds.
If you watch the scene carefully, he puts in the code wrong. And in particular see here, he neglects to press the 6. He definitely entered the code all wrong before he stirred the oxygen tanks and the electrical circuit burst.

Slim odds for safe return they were that would not be reported to President Nixon, who wanted to know what their "odds" were. But note how the news as such would make it to Mrs. Lovell, who kept calling, would be, of interest in the story.Learn to distinguish the story from the intelligence you can name. Sometimes its the same. It turns out we are predictable. The story points to philosophical, what would be the lesson taken? I did not discuss Apollo 13 movie of the 1970's DVD, the aforesight prophecy as of yet, the prophetic analysis.

A "quadruple failure" could not be understood. And they're venting the oxygen. The question might be, what the heck happened Swigert? But it wasn't. Why not? That is the question. /

"CROWNED?" Swigert

Apollo 13, a recount of event of April 11-17, 1970, the Apollo 13 mission. $ speak of the time relevant. I would have been six years old, and enrolled at the Happy Hollow School, Wayland, MA. at 617-877-5327 The house it was life necessary to move from, which sold legally, 33 Oak Hill Rd. Hot topic these days, what is a "life necessary asset", more or less.

Cold War... They don't understand its not just to balance the budget but to sign to trust, is the nature of things unavoidable. Till there's security, at least.

You see, the trick to it was this. There's a file not found, but there's how it spreads around. You know what it means, and it makes normal participation impossible, so you remain on the sidelines. Out of medical professionals who impose their need on patients. Like why you might receive treatment, but it shouldn't be that way. Consider survival challenged times already. This repeats, as it does. Similarly in 1990, it says.. faulty. Till, there's what my dad would sign, that they'd like to say someone too yellow to inherit, and such money priviledges. So much so this factor, they've altered the environment. Repeats in a great "game of telephone". Be careful what you're supporting. You'll find people who are full of ideas, with goals. S.E.M.

But there's a problem to solve indeed, that there might be security, at least.

Apollo "13" might have been a navigational requirement for future space travel success? And the sound to the sadness but of an end was it not to "Apollo" missions? Think the navigable roads and why. Like if you look on my map at home page, is there a way that Japan is actually South of Hawaii because there's the round planet? Maybe not, but, its like that idea. When its navigable. When its we should be mind focused that South Pacific/Asian region of earth is actually its "magnetic North". That our minds focus this way ultimately is important. We are always considering the North pole that we consider the map. Consider that the sphere earth rotated around and now from Hawaii you are still considering northern. A great mishap, to then be on its way, space travel?

Its APRIL 29-

That the computer would up and run again. It generally doesn't that way that it will. There's a communication dilemma recognized by Gene. To fix the oxygen leak there's the project that begins with "put a square peg through a round hole". But the project also represents them trying to communicate, that its to get the computer up and running again. They can't quite focus to come to this conclusion. Think 2 attentions have formed. Note though they function as would the military, the astronauts are without military objective. Note Gene retains command, and how he is challenged more than once. They have objectives like that as they work. Gene who is on top of idleness. The higher standard can do things like multiple function when there's a better understanding. Their objective would be described as crowning of the most eligible bachelor. But why?, recall.

But that there be this communicating, that the computer would be up and running again, isn't too likely they know, they can see. On the ship where "they can add", Swigert's line. Somewhere here there was connection between people over an understanding. Somehow that pointed to future $ solve. It would be over $ solve could somehow be understood. The avoidance, must have been realized, the human avoidance the avoidance of what is anti- survival I think. Fred Haise was sick because he had a wife who was expecting at home, points to $ stress. The reading of letter from Mary, starts off scenes where tensions are apparent. The three truly remain amicable. Later where the truth about things might be recalled back on Earth's ground, friendship would be based on trust. But there was connecting here. What the scene would mean. A riddle that might someday be solved. Life was bad bad news. But there was a great success. That bad bad news would mean the toil of work effort that efforts might prove $ rewardable, but how? The film points to a problem solves in a certain way. It really doesn't. But what is it that saves a launch?

I believe it was to sacrifice the electricity that would be needed for the ATTITUDE BALLS, the device that helps them see angles for steering. Instead to fly it in on manual. The COMMAND MODULE completely powered down, what they would sacrifice. That Ken Mattingly would be working out what to do on the ground, the drama suggests that on ship they're way ahead. In the MANUAL BURN scene that they would lock it into directional. I will be back soon with clarify. Its APRIL 30. ..... Sure enough, its the earth to be kept in the window, instead of the attitude balls powered by computer for seeing driving angles. When its the manual burn scene. Connected?, over prophecy. They are friends. That is true as is the story of them. Ken from the ground is supportive. Affirmative electronic is seen to be so. On Gene's mind, are the parachutes going to open. Here's to the important rights of socialism. I believe this event is how things took that swerve. I learned to be able to distinguish, as I have pointed out recently, what is not the same as point USA, but very important the rights of what are really the workers. ~ That $ SOLVE is HERE!! Yes, very GOOD NEWS indeed. 2024 MONEY full of its "3D" potential call it, that control would be redistributed via MICRO (say MACRO and MICRO are so and not theoretical). Human history is a long story of a poverty factor based in an avoidance of anti- survival. CONNECTED people again a riddle pointing as it would have to be to $ solve. That IN THE FUTURE $ SOLVE, THINGS MIGHT BE CORRECT. So how is it there that there was THE RITARD, as we say. (321 analysis we have learned of). Surely here LIKE A KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOUR, FROM A LONG TIME AGO? This chic is for real, SUZY MCLAUGHLN referenced, 1970? Nixon shaking hands there with "ritards". CROWNED, but why was that? Go to twitter.com. Take a lesson, when its three astronauts. They would be called THE GHOST DUSTERS . Military idea, all about connected people. Ever heard the term the V PLANET? Answers are here. MUSIC goes on FOR THE GLORIA! 1970.. So PRAISE GOD FROM WHOM ALL BLESSINGS FLOW, and say 300 AD, the mystical AD. When there was the legalization of CHRISTIANITY because it pointed to $ solve. Till then, "blasphemy"! They lost the legal money, and grabbed for the food unit instead. That the MICRO would become the MACRO.

 

When Jack Swigert and Ken Mattingly spoke. Recall, questions over condensation. When, electronics are seen to come through affirmative. Then sure enough, the command module says the "uplink telemetry." But they'd sacrifice the "attitude balls", and manually lock it into directional (angle). See MANUAL BURN, scene. Jim Lovell is at the helm. But to hear from Gene on who would fly it in but -

To thine own self be true. See afterflight conference link below, the 3 astronauts of Apollo 13. 1972.., are things not headed off in a correct way? Recalled "I am not a crook", and he forswore the ways, said GODSPELL, 1972/3. PAY ORGANIZATION recognized. Connected over military objective, Apollo 13, to CROWN. React-back IDEA, make money happen later IDEAL

Sir Isaac Newton in the driver's seat not out of the goodness of heart but because that would be correct. Jim Lovell says "She's yours to fly." That would be consistent with their conversation. There were then HOPES because of such success of Apollo 13. Understood on a level intelligent, aware. Focused and backed by importance.

RECOGNIZE INVALIDITY. It might help your computer to run this page through it of pure invalidity somehow. CODE... To say invalidity again and again? Think context. Think that the display itself would be invalid. You've a sense for this. That there were ever letters and base ten numbers. That invalidity be different than thought to be. Invalidity can mean error. Invalidity would mean to hear, from the dvl 321 $/$. The computer would show its invalidity. Or would show it as invalid. To HEAR from "Republican Evil", that was. 321 $/$ MICRO .Oh, you'll hear, responsible.

MAY 7, 2024-

So I said I'd tell you how they connected over the future. Recall in the scene where Jack hits his head on the spaceship. He says "I CAN ADD". The future is a mathematical certainty. But IF THINGS ARE CORRECT. "Freddo" does act a bit like the well known character "Frodo", for whatever reason. That there might be not false prophecy. See what you see in the scene. That was so but insight might differ. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_I1xmpGEDc .."Or we're just going to wind up in the same place". (Or we're just going to wind up in the same place wondering how to survive). Sealed deal for the future was NOT ON BOX. Its with the three, ground control not believing in anything but mathematical certainty. "He says it on the money", says Freddo, speaking of a lie. To live a lie? To earn the $. On the other hand, the irony of the card might have been asked of myself, said Lovell in "Apollo 13", 1995. They speak the devil, the three. On another communication level though, Swigert remains alone, with what is seen to be true heroism. To consult the other might not later be consistent with their agreeing. "THE RITARD", that would be correct. Must not speak of responsibility. But recall their conversation. It would be Jack and not the others that was CROWNED. Till finally, "she's yours to fly", (Sir Isaac Newton).

That things be correct, CROWNED, you see that there be WAR, a sin, is it not to STAY CORRECT? And say the rights of the other side. Swigert, is of a Scandinavian descent? So, the other side socialism was so. When its the other side, his color will always be red. Jesus' color was red, you see, when its essentially "the Jewish Church". The clock tower belongs at the factory, wary of freedom and Democracy. "Earth shall be fair, and all her people one", from Godspell, 1972. The future is speaking.

Understand the important rights of the workers. Who ironically would take the welfare card. The DVL progress, that ultimately the welfare state is gone. The objective of the astronauts was? See last picture this page below, when its what happens given things stay correct. Quite a set of cards. MAY 23, 2024 - https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B00D5UGM86/ref=atv_dl_rdr?deepLinkingRedirect=1&autoplay=1 Interestingly enough this is the hyperlinking URL (uniform resource locator) for the Apollo 13 video available to view at amazon.com That you might come up with it at another link address, what might that mean. I'm not sure if that might be so. In terms of its INVALIDITY, that its on the internet, or its validity that it would be valid. What does it say?, but something. Don't take it for granted that there are just for some reason letters and numbers. That pertains to validity for what things are about. That there would be computing BASE 10 numbers, why? Ken Mattingly worked on how it all might be done with 20 amps. But that the electricity came on, I think its that it was ON. The other might have represented hopes, wishful thinking. That it did come on properly, the parachutes would open, was worried about. The computer would apparently execute such task.

MAY 26, 2024

(MORE NEW NOTES) on "Apollo 13", 1995

When Jack Swigert and Ken Mattingly spoke. Recall, questions over condensation. When, electronics are seen to come through affirmative. Then sure enough, the command module says the "uplink telemetry." But they'd sacrifice the "attitude balls", and manually lock it into directional (angle). See MANUAL BURN, scene. Jim Lovell is at the helm. But to hear from Gene on who would fly it in but -

To thine own self be true. See afterflight conference link below, the 3 astronauts of Apollo 13. 1972.., are things not headed off in a correct way? Recalled "I am not a crook", and he forswore the ways, said GODSPELL, 1972/3. PAY ORGANIZATION recognized. Connected over military objective, Apollo 13, to CROWN. React-back IDEA, make money happen later IDEAL

Sir Isaac Newton in the driver's seat not out of the goodness of heart but because that would be correct. Jim Lovell says "She's yours to fly." That would be consistent with their conversation. There were then HOPES because of such success of Apollo 13. Understood on a level intelligent, aware. Focused and backed by importance.

Proof for as they say "things come through CORRECT". To decide upon, and they do agree at the end of the film, Da Vinci Code, on the importance of the HOLY GRAIL as it has come to be known. How they meet the professor as they become in search of Leonardo Da Vinci's great painting of the last supper. Its significance, describes the professor. Its HOLY GRAIL. But "its what you support", what you protect", concluded Sophie. Similarly, R Langdon desribes how his beliefs help him survive. And from here, truly, all of what life's experiences meant to you is most important. But here we see, proof of what it means that something come through, CORRECT. Then things will "line up", for success.

OOPS! The Mp4 is a bit too much to upload for computer, or for whatever reasons these days. But here is what is key. See also such evidence on my recent TWITTER BLOG. At the right time, the CLOCK, the COMPUTER

1984.. What did the PINK PAPER, the FRONT COVER, ever say but? 1987 graduate St Lawrence University. What is gotten out of college study but much. Rest assured you read that as you might and it stuck with you.

Still on the line. Copies of such AS #######... M-7 Flight Rules Manual may still be around are of interest. From 1970. Things tend to replay. As we say the FRATERNITY, is together forever. That on the other side, meant the flurdeli of the Romans. In challenging times, we really only do this waltz with the past. Like to consider 2000 years ago. The key analysis, you see is 321. Amounts to the 2 sides MICRO is going on.

 

 

As the realization of not going to be able to go sets in, Ken Mattingly, is disappointed?
Key when its FLIGHT COMMANDER is to the end of the mission. See how the others have already inattended. Gene heard Lovell, "This is Apollo 13 signing off". When they hear after 4 minutes.. Gene's breakdown, then the thought its the great pride, yes but an act, to retain composure. One is attended to till the end and hearing of "Apollo 13 signing off". See 2 attn's formed. Reminiscent of Apollo1, Apollo 13.
"Apollo 13 signing off", said Jim Lovell. To the end of the mission is key. An important idea pertains to many endeavors. Typically, when others are off-responsibility, also waiting for final moments, they'd be more or less quietly at computer still. Attention dilemmas were a factor back in 1970. The Computer keeps us properly focused.
link

The two sides $/$ MICRO and MICRO

At the root of everything. Everything meaning baggage, what we claim things are about, there's this meaningful at the root.

Baggage - Say "the accomodated dieter" and the "established secretive control".

But really at the root is what turns into this ultimate WALTZ. Futility over there.. Today there's speaking futility here. The feud the futile

WE ARE WAITING FOR THE SURRENDER OF MONEY TO THE BANK

Work effort reward

That there might be the right to BANK, there is seen a problem handing to the other recognized validity. Validity indications, they know, and also maybe they can't. Note the similar search human and computer for validity.

Factor

Clearly for these people this must mean the PAY ORGANIZATION

In the past decades, note it was that THE BANK would continually be interrupting nature. Ultimately thre's a problem and no longer can you say a situation is another.

~

That Swigert was crowned, and crowned most eligible bachelor. It is that he would suggest the devil, and that that was correct. Because he himself is a foreignish identifiable presence to celebrate. Is he not Scandinavian? Anyway, that there be let me tell you, the problem of war. It is a sin, according to the word of God. On the other hand isn't it to be correct? He suggested the rights of the other side. Then given problem, to suggest the important rights of the other side.

Apollo 1 disaster reminiscent, Apollo 13. And I know why. Its activity way away, for what we're ever saying. Should there be such lone activity way away as would be a DOWNS SYNDROME person who isn't quite that way in functioning. That way away activity means something else. When its this waltz. Dr. Seuss rhyme to iambeter time. In the traditon of war, the futility that exists proves to be important (that is completely true, the futile situation), but it can prove to be one your side, that life is. They would survive in the past that two sides warred. For that reason, like in the Civil War. Believe it or not it matters. DOWNS SYNDROME people today prove to be the effective communication facilitators.

Ultimately in the film what would be a "quadruple failure". Described in the recount that the "undervolt" first B then A too would be a problem. "Its not instrumentation", the conclusion. That there was an electrical failure, reported on the news, as it was translated by Marilyn Lovell which made sense if you listen to that news report in the film Apollo 13. See actual news television footage from 1970, and Marilyn Lovell on the phone to NASA, translate "an electrical failure", what exactly is that? (What would have meant in the PLAN 5! 5! 5!, an electrical short). Then such was reported apparently oh so true, by expert astronaut. Swigert, accordingly as planned.

To hear God, and say self, great but look what happens but problem. 5! 5! 5! (watch scene shortly after the rocket's launch in Apollo 13).

They know this and how to then be able to move forward for success given such reality. Is why the 321 move, for human success, and navigation. Apollo 13, necessary for such future space flight success. Why?, successful human actvity given such realities for now. Electricity is ultimately dependant on human activity and where there's been connected people. 321..., connected people, but you've heard of such connected before its time problem. There's looking to as we do and wait for $ destiny. So cheers, say "the clock is running", and the computer truly off on (off/on) a new compute. Off on a new search for validity having been simply redirected to the MACRO. Everything "way out there", after work, life, progress. To regather, for "redistribution". To get the same number back with a hgher value. Perhaps you can craft such equation or graph.

Listening to the interview of the three after the flight. (see link from this web page) :

On some level Lovell questioned hasn't exact answers. Seems to suggest, is Swigert going to take responsibility? That must have been harrowing in life for Swigert. To properly understand this. What they did that had never been done before, if you listen to the second half of interview was power down the command module. They "threw away the book." Swigert was no doubt properly focused. Problematic in communication and otherwise the book, details of the work were then verified on the ground. Lovell describes powering down the "attitude balls", without which they might have not been able to see angles for steering. The "Attitude Controller" was found to be enough for steering the ship. But what they did Swigert largely in control of, was to power down the entire command module. The process continually reported in detail, was then verified by the ground controllers. And the success was the reactivation then of the command module, that the computer responded. See photo above. Computer was up and running again. Is such phenomena like in the launch. Why the activity is so important, connected people, connected over some understanding pointing to $ solve.

The story of crowning? That we might recognize the important rights of the other side. Read above. That the computer responded I believe it was due to the successful human activity. Like in the plan? Reported. Like in the launch. It was a waltz because in the launch, was the success. Then that that success would happen again.

VALIDITY/VALIDITY 321 is MICRO/MICRO

DOWNLOAD LINKED IN POSTS MAY 4, 2024, APOLLO 13, 1970/recount, 1995 Hollywood film.

In the launch is COMBUSTION, is saved that there's a devil, a - charge hiding with sights ahead. OFF is a VAT VOID. And the burning of matter is a factor. The physical science phenomena of "looking to the GREEN (off) ahead". ..in motion/ In the combustion that saves the launch. The intelligent electronic responds to save the launch. Ultimately electricity and human activity are dependent.

 

That there will be this crowning. Somehow electricity is dependent on us, 321 move that there would be us successful. So it was so and he had followed the plan, Swigert. But the three concluded that they lost the moon because they'd listened to the flight commander. On some level they remained agreeable truly, even "Freddo", and that was so. And the argument between Freddo and Jack, how it is worked out, they remain friends. So in the drama, in the story you would say. Then it was the idea of "putting Sir Isaac Newton in the driver's seat".Swigert properly focused for the return. God's point as seen in Apollo 13? What it can mean to listen to God/to hear God. Its about how electricity is dependent on human activity. Human connection was known here and there. But it waits for $ destiny. Certainly you've come across theorists on this topic. That charge would say the COMPUTER, and he says "the clock is running" reflecting the charge. When its combustion, launch. When he follows God's point there's an evil nonetheless. An electrical failure, was the lost launching engine. (see actual launch 1970 on LinkedIn, an expected event). Quadruple failure ultimately was it an electrical failure? Loss of all electrical power was news reported. See scene of actual television footage and Marilyn Lovell describes "an electrical failure", "exactly what is that?" (an interesting point to clarify, -SEM)on the phone with NASA. As planned, you see, as the objective was the computer up and running again, as Jack reports around that time, of such news broadcast, that he powers down the computer. That it might be up and running again. Communication challenged on the ground, it took a time for them to conclude the objective was that. "electrical failure" What actually happened? Was it electrical failure?, indeed. Plan.. was it not the waltz with the first event as in the scene in Da Vinci Code where the doves arrive, next scene Sophie turns it around, the "waltz". When they were saved by the doves. To understand war, war's origins, and why not to stray from such origins. To consider the expert astronaut, when its who and how is whom in charge. That they would function in a military fashion, consider how the objectives here would be different than that.
Above 2 images are from such actual location, 1970, the Apollo 13 mission.

SSI.., then how's there the DVL? The DVL that might mean "endless progress".

55.../Oddly enough "FastScanner(55).pdf" was this file.

the effort you wouldn't tax/ FREE MARKET ECONOMY - "Downtown".. to sing of. "The funny nose that's all inflamed?". See above, the mystery of the pink paper. To tear the cover off. "Watergate Scandal", is it not the STORY (important term), of SSI? Feeling fat today?

In 1984 the idea was just that. Participate as such (mission your name on it?), here's SSI.

Note the BRACKETS. The Computer has solved a display problem, when its upper left corner importance.

Was it not a tug for validity a certain way "321"? This can amount to two sides. The establishing of a secretive type control and the dvl that might mean endless progress. Ultimately.. possibilities. The MACRO

Note the FINAL FLIGHT MISSION RULES booklet is seen in film of length 1:45:30 Apollo 13, at 0:34:15 . For that number I've got 45500100LM-7 under Apollo 13. What it could mean to say I've found the PINK PAPER, like by FastScanner(55).jpg (A question might be, does the number come into focus?). But this strategy said R- Uh-oh "Houston- Jack was eventually told by the .., to tear off the cover of the Plan Book, (They didn't want Jack then in the driver's seat) 321 analysis dramatic art. What it meant to be CROWNED?, Swigert. Archibald Cox, the prosecuting attorney of R.M. Nixon in Watergate Scandall. Archibald Cox's wife was the Wayland 4-H Horse Club leader and founder, where I was member and SECRETARY in 1977-1980. I remember Mrs. Cox used to speak of a "time capsule", that we might as a 4-H Club create a "time capsule" with items to recall from the day in 1977/78, to be opened some time far into the future. Or by people who would recall us. Apollo 13 amounts to what would pay my dad's salary who worked at RCA selling/marketing ATE, automatic test equipment, to the army. $ speak .. was relevant then that such SSI... In search of HOLY GRAIL? 2024.. Now say the PINK PAGE 55 is seen to get passed around the fraternity. Crown..You see, when there's the job of an astronaut, its not the same as soldier who follows orders. They need the control delineated to them to do their job properly. When its always to follow orders. You would want to "put Jack in the driver's seat". Now reference this theme in Da Vinci Code as well. From where came such trend?, as we understand to distinguish what is POINT USA from what is the important rights of socialism. Such distasteful situations go away when you can distinguish when there's not listening to the laws of the land. Like to hear on SSDI . The devil will say 321, ritard. The devil invalid (like, its not a disk, its a disk image, for instance). (invalid=MR) Like the computer, the human tool is in search of validity and after correct. Reflective of the human is about the search for validity which is about survival/control and the power of the $. What its all about the computer knows as well as on and off electrical. So it follows, D/V mode. Today it leads.The pink paper ? Its the file not found of 1970. See how events replay again? So, when its to decipher or detect, what did it ever say but Wynot? Why important? That my dad signed it. It wants to describe "yellow" selfishly. 1984 to what life could never mean?,. think hockey.Possible outcomes were so, its 2024. So here I am on the important stage with $ solved. A validity?.. From Apollo 13, note how for Jack Swigert there is then the idea that he is not wanted in the driver's seat, and told to tear off the front cover of the flight manual. That they follow the book note to note is shown as essential, and quite ironic says Jim Lovell, "and if that isn't exactly right, we could be headed where up here". Note astronaut is not a soldier, when its to follow orders, its different, different job. Like to give the job to the actor, it is not of the director. The actor is given the job of portraying a character. In contrast, learn not always to listen for instance if told to "always paste on a big smile", become your own thinker, and don't forget the importance when its react-back, the essence of medicine's true value. 321-123, its very good news for all. P for poor, based in an avoidance, is a long story of the place. An avoidance of what is anti-survival. What it could mean, the Captain of a Ship, H.M.S. ..., the leadership of her. The point in Apollo 13 I see is the amazing return of the astronauts against incredible odds. Why?, because Jack was put in the "driver's seat". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMMw2QIHBLs&t=756s I came across this historical video of the three astronauts of Apollo 13 describing what had happened. Recall the speech, "I am not a crook"? Well, this video speaks for itself. Over an hour long it ends with the naming of MOST ELIGIBLE BACHELOR. To be CROWNED. This is surely "TIME CAPSULE" solved. Suzy Mclaughlin of Wayland and Falmouth, also Cherry Hill, NJ in 1970. Back to top of pageMORE NEW on APOLLO 13- COMPUTER DIFFICULTIES 321. SEE NOTES JUST BELOW

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________MORE NEW on Apollo 13, 1996/Apollo 13, 1970, when its the recount movie. Its JUNE 28, 2024. The scene where Swigert hits his head and the two argue. To HEAR- RITARD. To conclude "Sir Isaac Newton". But what was to the driver's seat in the ship, why?, because that would be correct. Listen to the scene. That there was connected people, connected in an understanding. That there was the electricity, was the computer, were then the parachutes.

 

 

 

 

 

Did a mission not say 321, shown here at 1:20:33. I've the ticket 2. Communication was so, only over that you see. To pick up ticket 2. Spacetime aware, is it not?

The few seconds where you see the PINK COVER. See above. Here, the moment you see the GREEN COVER. How and whyso?

Zoom in and you can see its 1:20:33 again. The point is its not a single frame but a hundredth number relevant. How many frames must be then in a hundredth these days? I'm not sure. In this recount of past event, you see this for a brief moment, for whatever reason.
See surrounding hundredth of a second frames. To say something was displayed so that its legal? I guess so. LINK
Jack was instructed to tear off the cover of the manual from the ground control, why? (Not Jack in the driver's seat.)But Jack would be the one to fly the ship into reentry, if you watch the ending you'll see.
To CROWN THE MOCK TOWER? Its why a church wouldn't be Jewish. Look for someone to come forward and say they're responsible. Watergate? What was it really mostly over but $ speak, that there was some drama like this from the time. Explain WATERGATE. My hunch is there really wasn't responsibility.

Below, this is the important scene of the film from 1939, Gone With The Wind. Observe insincerity and what it can mean.

Gone With The Wind is a tremendous romantic tale.

time to think
acknowledges lied to
Scarlet might have said, I'm the devil actually Ashley. Life's a lie. Because like Rose in Titanic, she portrays the traditional female victim. Apparently there can't be going to Mexico? Off to Mexico...

Scarlet comforts Ashley. He's losing Melanie so of honoring. Not to miss that war honor, considering war's horror. Scarlet says you really do love Melanie, I see. And I've loved something that doesn't exist. Somehow it no longer matters. Recall the ending, to realize "tara". God, the Devil, moves away, Ashley is about honor, as would mean God's point. The film end's with God's point. Hear that music. Like Ashley pointed out to Scarlet, her answer is "tara", the land, Ashley of honor. Which would be the enemy when it was Cold War oncoming. They're people who tried life. That they'd meet with sorrow, failure, they're people who tried life. God so wants His people to try life. If life's a lie and of lying, the God, the Devil who'd walk amongst, will be by. Its the plot of a great, and not a simple story. That there's being smart and insightful, they're people who tried life, what might they mean?

Note that Rhett Butler would suggest dishonor. He constantly criticizes Scarlet in his perception. Scarlet responds with a $ wisdom. A $ wisdom in contrast.

More on GONE WITH THE WINDScarlet O'Hara a bad news, tragic character. She would throw things, she would pout and tantrum when things didn't go her way. She proved to take over the running of the plantation responsibly and successfully. The way they worshipped and lived.

Such rising above as land owner. Puts the faith belief to shame. It is you see important, and goes along with $ speak pointing to what things are anticipated when there's $ destiny's arrival. The worship of the status quo, is staying biblical and holy. Ultimately such living proved to be a problem. Pointing to interesting, for learning and realistic, and with certainly a utility. To learn the ways not to live, not to be. She is very much Scarlet O'Hara, perfectly reflecting that economic way of life. There was the good that the plantation ended. Scarlet is seen to mature and grow in a positive way as a person through the hardships and challenges. Fiercely independent, she recalls those words from long ago, and then it clicks, "tara", "tara". She tells herself, oh I'll win Rhett back, though she won't, but, "tomorrow is another day"! So, the film not tragic.

 

So what is the DVD prophetic analysis? When its Gone With The Wind. Prophecy in the plot was so. The first and the last consideration, the land. There's still the land. All the life in the film, the characters, the scenes. After the war, there was still the land. Truly as D V and D in form. The plantation owners, consider themselves as would be God, that they owned the land. As represented in such dramatic format. The writer's prophetic consideration takes that form. A meaningful part of the story, was such prophecy that came from the plantation, the land owner. Such rising above God, was it related to the Civil War? Why was there really the Civil War? Different forces were relevant. Key is the situation of people who would work the land then, involving the slaves, was not allowable.

Security has been from the land. Property taxes mean of the land, for which there's the title. This understanding is seen to be in all, though I speak it out today. Because ultimately there is the return of the WORD as such I speak things which are simply so.

Not the prophet? not the prophecy? (O'Hara) The idea... Did trying to be such prophet as would be the God, not leave the man with as they say "a bit of the old harra/harry"? When its not yet time for THE WORD

The bible, ?Bible, is meant for you to consider at such time as today. Understand the Jews wrote of in the Old Testament, as the good would speak through the prophet. There was once THE WORD, in artful explanation, but THE WORD went away. And then there have been the times of prophecy, as a destiny waits. There will never be such destiny say some because the land will never really be owned, that the goal be land ownership.

Scarlet O'Hara of less than sacred ideals, was taken in marriage by Rhett Butler. Rhett has a vision of Scarlet that doesn't show true appreciation. Based on her actions, she proves to be "a bit much". She'll always be Scarlet O'Hara, and argues back a $ wisdom to Rhett, and that explains her ways. Not meant to analyze there is the magnetism between the two, that is one of Hollywood's great romance tales. There was then being Scarlet O'Hara, and what that amounted to. Looking back, that there were people, what did they mean? Is how we analyze. After the story of them. The prophetic analysis, ending as Scarlet has matured through the tale, the great last line, recalling "tara" from the beginning, and "tomorrow is another day". They survived that two sides fought and there were still the lands of the USA.

Scarlet O'Hara when its film, book characters is a tragic one. Her reactions to things show selfishness. Throwing objects, dirt at the "carpet bagger" by after the war. Like the banker would be, presented as an evil. But you can't just throw dirt. Scarlet O'Hara, would be looking to marry, proves already set where there would be a need. When more life is available, let our reactions not be like that. She proved to be a bit much, as they say, most would agree. Plantations were not economically acceptable, but they were a way of life for a time with a utility factor. The story of plantations of the South, 1800's.

Discussion pertaining to Gone With The Wind

 

How and why we do things can take the form of this waltz 321. Speaking only of survival mode, $ speak, and what it can mean the devil.

Play your game. To play, your card.

 

See below- A set of cards indeed. WHEN THINGS ARE CORRECT -

 

CORRECT, to be able to reap the HARVEST from the past.